Rubric
Rubric for Overview of the "Teaching is Virtually Worth It!"
|
||||
Superb/Complete |
Satisfactory/ |
Incomplete |
||
Quality of Participation involves: |
||||
· Degree to which assignments are completed |
· Completes all course assignments within recommended timeline. |
· Completes most course assignments within recommended timeline |
· Sporadically completes and/or fails to complete course assignments within recommended timeline |
|
· Degree of participation in online communication (blogs, e-mail, forums, wikis, chat) |
· Actively participates in appropriate online communications, responds to facilitator emails in timelymanner |
· Participates in most online communications and responds to facilitator |
· Rarely participates in online communications or respond to facilitator emails |
|
Quality of Work involves: |
||||
· Degree to which participants’ connect course work to own professional experiences |
· Work is clearly and explicitly described referencing participant’s specific and relevant professional experiences |
· Work is clearly described referencing participant’s professional experiences |
· Work is unclear, vague and seems unconnected to participant’s professional experiences |
|
· Degree to which course work reveals participants’ effort and thinking |
· Contributions are precise, relevant, insightful and original. Clear, detailed problem solving approach is used |
· Contributions are specific, relevant and original. Problem solving approach used with some detail. |
· Contributions are not specific or relevant. Complaining, rather than problem solving approach is used |
|
Presentation of Work involves: |
||||
· The degree to which the online teaching kit is organized and professional |
· The online teaching kit is professional, focused and logically organized using precise and efficient language |
· The kit is professional, logically organized. |
· The kit is amateur-looking, disorganized, unprofessional with imprecise language |
|
·The degree to which the iNacol Standards for online teaching are integrated |
iNacol Standards for online teaching are clearly identified and directly relate to participants’ online teaching kit |
· iNacol Standards for online teachingare listed but not detailed or don't correlate well to participants online teaching kit |
· iNacol Standards for online teaching are not present or do not connect to participants’ online teaching kit |
|
·The degree to which the online teaching kit reflects the iNacol Standards for online teaching |
· The iNacol Standards for online teaching included in the online teaching kit are clearly delineated and focused |
· The iNacol Standards for online teaching are sufficiently explained |
· The iNacol Standards for online teaching are missing or do not correlate |
|
· |
· |